<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adiumeetie. Tweetie Style Adium Icon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/</link>
	<description>Home of designer, developer &#38; photographer Matthias Kretschmann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48559</guid>
		<description>Yea I understand, thats what I said lol, I see why you used icns, many designers take this seriously.

It doesn&#039;t seem so blurry though in list view pic here: http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-9.png

it just seems more &quot;sharp&quot;, i guess thats what you mean :P

Are you going to update it? Just out of curiosity xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I understand, thats what I said lol, I see why you used icns, many designers take this seriously.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem so blurry though in list view pic here: <a href="http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-9.png" rel="nofollow">http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-9.png</a></p>
<p>it just seems more &#8220;sharp&#8221;, i guess thats what you mean <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Are you going to update it? Just out of curiosity xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krema</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48558</link>
		<dc:creator>krema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48558</guid>
		<description>Hi &lt;strong&gt;Ahmed&lt;/strong&gt;, glad you like the icon. As for the 512px display of this icon in Finder: Unfortunately this is a bug of Adium&#039;s icns display and the use of icns files for the application icon is intended but it seems buggy. It&#039;s funny just the 512px resource in the icns file gets destroyed in quicklook/cover flow while all other sizes are rendered properly. 

I know all the other Adium icons are using just a 512px png file for their application icon but I can&#039;t accept this as a fix for this bug. Cause this way the 16px size in Finder is rendered with this png file so it&#039;s way too blurry e.g. in list view. I guess this is because usually all the Adium dock icons aren&#039;t redrawn with smaller sizes which always makes them blurry in smaller sizes. But thanks for your investigation anyway ;-) I suggest you also let the Adium devs know of this bug too so they see there&#039;re people caring for the pixel perfect look of the Adium icons ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <strong>Ahmed</strong>, glad you like the icon. As for the 512px display of this icon in Finder: Unfortunately this is a bug of Adium&#8217;s icns display and the use of icns files for the application icon is intended but it seems buggy. It&#8217;s funny just the 512px resource in the icns file gets destroyed in quicklook/cover flow while all other sizes are rendered properly. </p>
<p>I know all the other Adium icons are using just a 512px png file for their application icon but I can&#8217;t accept this as a fix for this bug. Cause this way the 16px size in Finder is rendered with this png file so it&#8217;s way too blurry e.g. in list view. I guess this is because usually all the Adium dock icons aren&#8217;t redrawn with smaller sizes which always makes them blurry in smaller sizes. But thanks for your investigation anyway <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I suggest you also let the Adium devs know of this bug too so they see there&#8217;re people caring for the pixel perfect look of the Adium icons <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48557</guid>
		<description>I fixed it, here is a link, if you could please update the adium page: http://www.box.net/shared/2f93h354qz

If you give me credit for finding the issue, thatd be nice but i dont care

here was the problem, .adiumicons dont recognize .icns, i looked into adium&#039;s own duck icons and they used pngs, 512x512 ones, so i replaced the icns in your .adiumicon with the 512x512 png you had in the pngs folder, then opened up the IconPack.plist and changed the Application icon to Adiumeetie Icon_512x512.png, now it works fine and the 512x512 version is completely viewable from finder

so the box.net link above is YOUR dock icon, but fixed so it doesnt give that weird image in the comment above. once you download it, you can shoot me an email and I will gladly take it down :)

I see that your an icon designer and why you used icns because the smaller versions like 16x16 were designed simpler, but AFAIK, adium apparently doesnt recognize them that way, just a small fix, i hope to hear from you regarding this! Thanks for reading :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fixed it, here is a link, if you could please update the adium page: <a href="http://www.box.net/shared/2f93h354qz" rel="nofollow">http://www.box.net/shared/2f93h354qz</a></p>
<p>If you give me credit for finding the issue, thatd be nice but i dont care</p>
<p>here was the problem, .adiumicons dont recognize .icns, i looked into adium&#8217;s own duck icons and they used pngs, 512&#215;512 ones, so i replaced the icns in your .adiumicon with the 512&#215;512 png you had in the pngs folder, then opened up the IconPack.plist and changed the Application icon to Adiumeetie Icon_512x512.png, now it works fine and the 512&#215;512 version is completely viewable from finder</p>
<p>so the box.net link above is YOUR dock icon, but fixed so it doesnt give that weird image in the comment above. once you download it, you can shoot me an email and I will gladly take it down <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I see that your an icon designer and why you used icns because the smaller versions like 16&#215;16 were designed simpler, but AFAIK, adium apparently doesnt recognize them that way, just a small fix, i hope to hear from you regarding this! Thanks for reading <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48556</guid>
		<description>AWESOME wow, the only real legit 512x512 icon for adium, and it looks awesome too, right next to tweetie, but one problem, the 512x512 version...doesnt look right, check out this screenshot: http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-8.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME wow, the only real legit 512&#215;512 icon for adium, and it looks awesome too, right next to tweetie, but one problem, the 512&#215;512 version&#8230;doesnt look right, check out this screenshot: <a href="http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-8.png" rel="nofollow">http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa70/bluedoggiant/Picture1-8.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaDe</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48529</link>
		<dc:creator>RaDe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48529</guid>
		<description>Awesome ! I&#039;ll download it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome ! I&#8217;ll download it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krema</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48525</link>
		<dc:creator>krema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48525</guid>
		<description>meh, I quite don&#039;t like skype so my motivation for polishing it is pretty low. But we&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh, I quite don&#8217;t like skype so my motivation for polishing it is pretty low. But we&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas Markauskas</title>
		<link>http://www.kremalicious.com/2009/06/adiumeetie/#comment-48523</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas Markauskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kremalicious.com/?p=844#comment-48523</guid>
		<description>I like it! What about one for skype? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it! What about one for skype? <img src='http://www.kremalicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

